Local Authorities – they just don’t get it!

[7th May 2013 – Scroll to the bottom for an update.]

This picture shows some road works that have appeared on Bolton Road in Salford, near the Pendlebury roundabout:
Road works on Bolton Road

I was pleased to see this raised “island” being put in because I have been cut up in the past by vehicles illegally using the shaded area (with a solid white border) to overtake me (again illegally) on the inside. This will stop them doing that, I thought; how good of the highway authority to think of that. Unfortunately, when I looked a bit more carefully, I realized that is not what they are doing.

But first let me backtrack a little. A few months ago, when I heard (on Twitter) of a speed limit change that was about to be made to another road nearby, I wrote to the Salford Council (on Twitter again) to suggest that that they change the speed limit of Bolton Road from 30mph to 20mph whilst they are at it. To my surprise, I got a very quick reply saying that they would consider it! This would be a significant improvement, as I have a lot of problems with motorists speeding and passing far to close when I am using this road. Well, it seems that they have recognized the problem there but taken a totally different approach to attempting to solve it.

As I travelled further, I noticed that this is has now appeared at the side of the pavement:

Shared use path sign

Notice the blue circular sign, which shows that they are making the pavement into a shared use path for cyclists and pedestrians; it is one of several that have been installed. Now, people who don’t have a clue about using a bicycle as a means of transport might say: “very good, they are sorting it out”, but in fact it is the worst change they could make. These are some of the reasons why it is bad:

  • When I travel along this road, I typically move at around 20mph, give or take a couple of mph depending on the wind. I often get overtaken by other cyclists who are able to move even faster than me along here. It is ridiculous to expect pedestrians to share space with cyclists doing that kind of speed.
  • If you look at the first and second picture above, you can see that there are side streets, and the pavement is apparently being arranged so that vehicles on the side streets have priority over cyclists on the shared path. This is ridiculous.
  • There are several bus stops along this road, such as this one: Bus stop.This particular stop is used during the rush hour for school buses, which disgorge 50 or more school pupils at once onto the pavement (shared use path). How can that possibly be considered safe?
  • At the far end of the road is a mini-roundabout, which is where I turn right. Their solution for that part of the scheme is this:road crossing at the end of Bolton Road.The shared path swerves across the road to the other side, to go who knows where? How can that be safer than simply riding along the road in the same direction as the motor traffic, as I am doing in this picture?
  • My own experience has shown me that if I choose to continue using the road when this so-called “cycling infrastructure” is present, I will experience arrogant motorists blasting their horns, screaming in rage, and using their vehicles as weapons to threaten and possibly even hurt me, even more than I did before.

Now, I can imagine all the arrogant motorists saying things like “well, why don’t you ride more slowly when you are using the path”, and “why should we slow down for you when you don’t want to ride more slowly”. Well, there are arguments against that point of view generally, but in this case those arguments are not necessary. What is happening here is just arrogance and stupidity when this (on the left) is running parallel to Bolton Road for the full length of this stretch:40 mph bypass parallel to Bolvont RdThis is the 40mph dual carriageway that was built to take the traffic off Bolton Road. In fact the change of speed limit that I mentioned near the beginning was a reduction of the speed limit on that dual carriageway from 50mph to 40mph – a change that has now been enacted.

This illustrates the absolute greed that is a characteristic of the personified motor vehicle as a result of the ingrained prejudices of the planners. Not only must the motor vehicle have a six lane wide dual carriageway dedicated to it, but it must also be the primary consideration, at a full 30mph, on the narrow access road that runs parallel. It is hard to see how we can overcome this sickness that pervades most of our society and move to a situation where people are put first before machines.

Update 7th May 2013: So, I can now see how they decided to handle the bus stops:

Cyclist dismount signs on Bolton Road

Of course, I should have guessed. What a bunch of absolute idiots. A lot of people walk out into the road from in front of the bus when it is stopped, so where are the “Motorists get out and push” signs!

This entry was posted in Article, Salford, Space for Cycling. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Local Authorities – they just don’t get it!

  1. TwoWheeledTank says:

    Go and look up Chris Boardman’s video on cycling on the BBC News. website. Published 25/04

  2. Mike H says:

    I work in Salford, riding from Rossendale every day and see this insanity almost everywhere I go. I’d love to sit down with the NW Highways Agency and actually talk them through what needs to happen.

  3. Mark Burton says:

    When I was in Germany some years ago it was interesting to see how cars emerging from or entering side roads automatically gave right of way to cyclists going along the (Proper) cycle track at the side of the road. Even in Australia (last time I was there, in ’96) cars in same situation give right of way to pedestrians walking along he pavement at the side of the main road.
    Here the ‘cyclists dismount and wait for everyone else’ ideology seems to dominate and local authorities design(sic) cycle routes without any reference to expert opinion from cyclists or planners elsewhere who know how to do this.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.